castrate the Carlisle takeaway boss has been jailed for 15 years for attempting to recruit four girls aged between 12 and 16 into prostitution.? obviously it takes

some people feel that way , watch the news below, happening a lot in Britain ASian abuse of English children by a supposid god fearing people or should people fear their God

15 May 2012 Last updated at 14:57

Share this page

• Email
• Print

Takeaway brothel boss Azad Miah jailed for 15 years

Azah Miah "hounded and stalked" his victims

Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

• Brothel boss targeted girl, 12
• Brothel boss case 'horrendous'
• Brothel accused 'gave' girl money

A Carlisle takeaway boss has been jailed for 15 years for attempting to recruit four girls aged between 12 and 16 into prostitution.

Azad Miah, 44, was also found guilty of running a brothel from his business and paying two teenagers for sex.

The married father-of-two was owner of the former Spice of India restaurant.

Judge Peter Hughes, QC, said the case at Carlisle Crown Court showed "the seedier side" of UK towns and called for more protection for children.

Miah was cleared of child prostitution allegations relating to two other girls.

Det Insp Geoff Huddlestone of Cumbria Police, said Miah had got the sentence he deserved and that he had "committed heinous crimes".

'Cold and clinical'

The hearing heard that one girl was encouraged to have sex with him out of desperation for cash when she was 15, while he had a sexual relationship with the other, a heroin addict, when she was aged between 15 and 17.

The jury also heard that the Bangladeshi national had targeted "desperate and vulnerable" victims and treated them in a "cold and clinical way".

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

You sought to draw them into a life of drug dependency and sleazy sex for money”

Judge Peter Hughes, QCCarlisle Crown Court

Passing sentence, Judge Hughes said: "This case reveals the seedier side of life in our town and city centres and what can happen to vulnerable and immature girls.

"There are lessons from this case for all of us to learn. There are lessons for parents to learn whose responsibility it is to protect their children.

"There are lessons for those responsible for safeguarding vulnerable teenagers from deprived backgrounds and without appropriate parental care and guidance."

The court also heard the 12-year-old girl had complained to police three times about Miah persistently harassing her in 2008, three years before his arrest.

She said she eventually gave up complaining because nothing was done, although Miah's legal team said there was no official record of her complaints.

'Corrodes decency'

Judge Hughes added: "There are lessons to be learnt by the police to be ever vigilant to detect signs of the possible exploitation and abuse of vulnerable people, and to take seriously what they say however chaotic and difficult their lives may be.

"A sad feature of this case is that there were a number of occasions when witnesses complained to police or community support officers about the defendant pestering them but their complaints were not taken further.

"As a result, opportunities were missed."

He also said that Miah had targeted his victims because of their troubled lives.

Judge Hughes said: "Over a number of years, behind the veil of a seemingly respectable business, you preyed on the immaturity and vulnerability of young girls from troubled and chaotic home backgrounds.

"You sought to draw them into a life of drug dependency and sleazy sex for money. When you did not desire their sexual services for yourself you made them available to others.

"Your conduct corrodes the foundations of decency and respect by which all right-thinking people live their lives whatever their ethnic or religious background."

I am not a free mason

Businessmen both at centre of serious investigationsBusinessmen both at centre of serious investigations
Friday, December 05, 2008, 07:05

HIGH-profile businessmen John Preece and John Kingdom have both been at the centre of serious investigations it emerged as the pair came face to face during a dramatic fourth day in the High Court.

Bespoke tailor Mr Kingdom was involved in an investigation about a theft allegation at a Masonic Lodge and Taxifast tycoon Mr Preece was probed about payments to an unnamed Plymouth City Councillor, the hearing, in Bristol, heard.

And, as Mr Kingdom corss-examined Mr Preece for a whole day in the civil hearing, it emerged both men suspected each other of initiating the investigations.

Mr Kingdom, boss of Stitches Tailoring, also accused Mr Preece of being ‘envious’ of his lifestyle, and said the end of their 20-year friendship had felt like ‘a divorce’.

Mr Preece denied there had been such a friendship and also a raft of accusations put by Mr Kingdom.

The Taxifast chairman repeatedly claimed the cross-examination to be a ‘fishing expedition’ and called Mr Kingdom a ‘poisonous Walter Mitty’.

Key Cabs, which trades as Taxifast, is suing Mr Kingdom, and ex-Taxifast employees Phil Manning and Dean Ruffles for conspiracy to injure and harassment. It alleges they conspired to make phone calls to event management firm Expotel which damaged a major business deal it was working on with Key Cabs’ Taxibank operation.

Taxifast also claims the defendants told Plymouth private hire drivers it was in financial trouble and published damaging newsletters containing allegations about the firm’s finance and Mr Preece’s private life.

The three defendants, who are representing themselves at the Chancery Division hearing in Bristol, admit they wrote the newsletters but deny circulating them. They deny the other allegations but are also claiming Taxifast’s finances are not as healthy as the firm had said.

On the third day, the trial had heard how there is an on-going probe by Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs into tax matters relating to Mr Preece.

But it also emerged the man ‘responsible’ for the investigation being called was Mr Kingdom.

As the trial took another dramatic twist, Mr Kingdom yesterday asked Mr Preece about whether he had spoken to Mr Ruffles about an investigation at the Mount Edgecumbe Masonic Hall where Mr Kingdom had been a bar manager, and an allegation of theft.

Mr Preece said: “I really don’t know.”

But then said: “You are out of your lodge, you are no longer a member of that lodge.”

Mr Kingdom asked: “Have you sent information to another lodge member?”

Mr Preece replied: “I am not a free mason, I have never wanted to be a free mason.”

Mr Kingdom asked if he had supplied information about court cases Mr Kingdom had been involved with, and Mr Preece said: “No.”

“Are you saying your company and you have never supplied any information?” asked Mr Kingdom.

“I can only talk about me and I have never supplied any information,” Mr Preece answered.

Mr Kingdom then produced a letter from the Masonic hall’s trustees which he said proved his ‘integrity’.

He asked Mr Preece if he had been behind a customs investigation into a rival Plymouth taxi firm, for ‘selling tobacco and red diesel’.

Mr Preece said he had not.

The taxi mogul was also questioned about an allegation that he had ‘bribed’ a Plymouth City Councillor and was quizzed by police.

“The allegation was that I had given the money to get contracts for myself,” said Mr Preece. “The police said there was no reason to be concerned, they wanted to clear up certain allegations.”

He explained his firm had carried out a transport survey, and admitted trying to get ‘a question about taxi buses in there’ but stressed: “That’s not bribing.”

He added: “They just wanted to know if I lent money to someone, as I do to a lot of people.”

Mr Kingdom asked if a company cheque had been paid to a woman, who then wrote a cheque to the unnamed city councillor.

“Did I make a contribution to the Liberal Democrats? Yes I did,” Mr Preece answered. “But I have also made contributions to the Conservative Party, as I still do, you know that.”

At this point Mr Kingdom admitted he had made a statement about this to police, saying they came to him because of his long friendship with Mr Preece.

He asked: “Was it a donation to that particular councillor for her party?”

Mr Preece said: “I can’t remember I think it was for the Liberal Democrat Party.”

During the heated questioning Mr Preece had said: “You tried to destroy people.”

He also accused Mr Kingdom of ‘plaguing’ him, and referred to a High Court hearing last year when Mr Kingdom was handed a suspended jail sentence for contempt after making allegations.

Mr Kingdom asked if he had ‘stopped’ when asked to, but Mr Preece said: “No, you did not stop harassing me, no.”

During yesterday’s hearing Mr Kingdom said: “We were friends for 20 years. I consider our friendship was broken like a divorced couple.”

Mr Preece replied: “There was never any friendship, you have been doing things behind my back.”

Mr Kingdom asked: “Have you ever been envious of me?”

Mr Preece replied: “I would never be envious of you John – I pity you.”

Mr Kingdom answered: “I have a fabulous wife, two children, I live in probably a much better house than you do, I have my own business premises – you have ended up, at 66, living in someone else’s house, with the business problems you have and no family whatsoever, why?”

Mr Preece said: “You have been pretty crass and stupid. I have said nothing about you.”

Later Mr Preece accused Mr Kingdom of being ‘a poisonous Walter Mitty’, while Mr Kingdom referred to language used in Taxifast newsletters, Mr Preece’s relations with the city council and his record on bringing litigation, and asked Mr Preece: “Do you consider yourself to be a bully?”

Mr Preece said: “No.”

The trial continues.

---------------------------

'FBI called in on property deals'
Friday, December 05, 2008, 19:31

ALLEGATIONS about taxi mogul John Preece's property dealings in America were made to the famous Federal Bureau of Investigation by bespoke Plymouth tailor John Kingdom, the High Court has heard.

As the civil action brought by Mr Preece and his Keycabs company went into a sensational fifth day in Bristol, Mr Kingdom admitted contacting the FBI.

But the allegation was described as 'nonsense' and an 'attempt to cause confusion' by Mr Preece's barrister David Fletcher.

The court also heard that Mr Kingdom had amassed 22 tape recordings of conversations with people described as 'disgruntled' with Mr Preece.

Yesterday the court was told about more allegations, this time about the world-famous FBI.

Mr Fletcher said that an email had been sent to the FBI in Las Vegas but said that the email address had been spelt incorrectly with an 'A' instead of an 'E' in Las Vegas.

Mr Fletcher said: "If it had been a real email it would have been spelt 'Vegas'."

But Mr Kingdom stressed: "I have spoken to the FBI. It is not a spoof. I may have faxed it to them."

Mr Fletcher asked: "You think you may have faxed it to the FBI in Las Vegas? Do they have FBI in Las Vegas?"

Mr Kingdom said: "No, the London office."

Mr Fletcher said: "It is a nonsense, another attempt to cause confusion."

He said the allegation referred to a mortgage Mr Preece had on a house in Nevada but asked how Mr Kingdom had information about such dealings and indeed whether what Mr Preece was alleged to have done was even illegal.

Keycabs, which trades as Taxifast, is suing Mr Kingdom and two ex-Taxifast employees, Phil Manning and Dean Ruffles, for conspiracy to injure and harasssment.

The firm claims they damaged a major business deal between Keycabs' Taxibank operation and event management firm Expotel.

It is alleged they did this via phone calls to Expotel and two newsletters containing allegations about Taxifast finances and the private life of Mr Preece.

The defendants admit writing the newsletters but deny circulating them, claiming they were designed as a private joke. They deny the other allegations.

There was also further discussion about allegations made about the Taxifast chairman, Mr Preece, to the police and the Inland Revenue, regarding his tax position.

The court heard more about allegations made by Mr Kingdom to the Inland Revenue about another prominent Plymouth businessman which resulted in, the court heard 'that man having to pay £400,000'.

Mr Fletcher told Mr Kingdom he was 'a serial reporter to the Inland Revenue', which Mr Kingdom denied.

Earlier the court had heard that allegations had been made to police and taxmen about Mr Preece and these were still being investigated.

Mr Kingdom was alleged in court to have been 'responsible' for those inquiries.

The court also heard that allegations of theft at a Masonic Lodge to which Mr Kingdom belongs had been made and Mr Kingdom has quizzed Mr Preece about whether he had passed information to that lodge.

Mr Fletcher also said that reporting Mr Preece to police and the Inland Revenue was an 'attempt to intimidate him'.

Mr Kingdom replied: "No, sir".

He said that he received information from 'disgruntled employees' and added 'there were a lot'.

Earlier Mr Fletcher had asked Mr Kingdom if he had written to Taxifast managing director Simon Hirst alleging 'Mr Preece was mentally unstable'.

Mr Kingdom replied: "Yes".

Mr Kingdom also said his memory was cloudy on some matters because 'I have been on Valium for 18 months'.

However, when he was grilled about the two newsletters he denies sending and various emails he admitting sending to Mr Preece he repeatedly stressed they had been intended as 'spoofs'.

He said one newsletter had been written by Mr Manning and the other by him, though he alleged that a copy which fell into the hands of Taxifast had been altered.

He said of the newsletter he authored: "It is a wind-up".

Mr Kingdom said his only involvement with a rival taxi firm called Unicabs was as a potential landlord.

The civil trial in The Chancellory Division and before his Hon Judge Mark Havelock-Allan was scheduled to end on Thursday but will now go into next week.

------------------

Taxi mogul in tax probe court told

Thursday, December 04, 2008, 07:00

TAXI mogul John Preece is at the centre of a tax investigation, a High Court hearing has been told.

The Taxifast chairman revealed, during cross-examination on the third day of a civil trial his firm is bringing, there is an ongoing probe by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.

But it also emerged the man 'responsible' for the investigation being called was bespoke tailor John Kingdom, one of three defendants and the person cross-examining Mr Preece.

Mr Kingdom had asked several questions about Mr Preece's whereabouts at different times, and property he owned in Plymouth and abroad, stating for tax purposes the businessman had to spend a certain amount of time out of the country.

Mr Kingdom mentioned 'a personal investigation opened by HMRC' and asked: "Is that still ongoing?"

Mr Preece replied: "Yes."

He said it was about 'alleged discrepancies' regarding time spent abroad.

His Honour Judge Mark Havelock-Allan asked Mr Kingdom: "You are responsible for the HMRC investigation?"

Mr Kingdom replied he was 'visited from an officer'.

Mr Preece then accused Mr Kingdom of initiating another tax probe into a well-known Plymouth businessman.

He said to the tailor: "You cannot resist interfering in my life and other people's lives. You have destroyed people's lives."

Key Cabs, which trades as Taxifast, is suing Mr Kingdom, and ex-Taxifast employees Phil Manning and Dean Ruffles for conspiracy to injure and harassment.

It alleges they conspired to make phone calls to event management firm Expotel which damaged a major business deal it was working on with Key Cabs' Taxibank operation.

Taxifast also claims the defendants told Plymouth private hire drivers it was in financial trouble and published a damaging newsletter containing other allegations.

The three defendants, who are representing themselves at the Chancery Division hearing in Bristol, don't deny they wrote the newsletter but deny circulating it. They deny the other allegations but are also claiming Taxifast's finances are not as healthy as the firm had said.

In a dramatic afternoon session, Mr Preece said allegations in one of the newsletters had been 'hurtful' and accused it of being produced as part of a 'conspiracy'.

Mr Kingdom asked if Mr Preece was a business 'hardball'.

"You have to be tough," Mr Preece said.

The court was then told about a threat to kill Mr Preece and what Mr Kingdom described as a 'catalogue of disasters'.

"You are a disaster – it's not a catalogue of disasters," Mr Preece replied.

Mr Kingdom then listed a number of attacks against Mr Preece's property including his stables being burned down, his dog being killed, paving slabs being thrown through a window, and paint thrown on a wall.

"Who needs enemies when I have you?" Mr Preece asked Mr Kingdom. "I've been burgled five times. You forgot to mention that."

Mr Kingdom asked if Mr Preece thought Hackney carriage drivers were responsible for the attacks and the private hire boss said: "Yes."

But he denied the accusation that his Plymouth home was a 'fortress'.

Mr Kingdom also asked about Mr Preece's relationship with Mr Ruffles, his former operations manager, and his wife Jane, with whom Mr Preece has told the court he 'co-habited' for a time.

Mr Preece described Mr Ruffles as having been 'a good driver' and Mrs Ruffles as 'special'.

Mr Kingdom asked Mr Preece about other women he had been involved with.

Mr Preece accused Mr Kingdom of being a 'gossip', denying loans he sought were to 'prop up Taxibank' but for normal business development.

He explained he had sold black cabs bought for £500,000 from David Trace, now a Taxifast director, because they were superfluous once Plymouth City Council had decided to grant him 20 taxibus licences for which he would need new vehicles.

Earlier the court heard from Taxifast security consultant Michael Foden, who said he saw one of the newsletters at a Hackney rank but had not collected it.

Driver Christopher Trevethan said he has spoken about the newsletters to Hackney drivers who were 'disgusted' at the personal content relating to Mr Preece, but were 'generally delighted' at the accusations about Taxifast's finances.

He said the firm's 'loyal customers' would have been concerned to think the company was in trouble.

Taxifast employee Gary Chase said the newsletters caused concerns among staff.

The trial continues.

--------------------

Tears from ex-taxi boss

Wednesday, December 03, 2008, 07:00

ONE of the defendants being sued by leading Plymouth private hire firm Taxifast left the courtroom in tears during the second day of a High Court hearing.

Ex-Taxifast operations manager Dean Ruffles broke down during cross-examination of his successor at the company, David Trace.

Mr Trace had told the civil hearing how he had visited Mr Ruffles' home to change locks following the revelation of an affair between Mr Ruffles' wife Jane and Taxifast chairman John Preece.

Earlier Sharon Smith, marketing communications manager for event management firm Expotel, told the court that Mr Ruffles' voice sounded 'a little bit like' that of an unknown telephone caller who made allegations about Taxifast staff and finances and said the firm's chairman had 'run off' with his wife.

London-based Ms Smith was only able to say the caller had a 'regional accent', and was then asked by Judge Mark Havelock-Allen to listen to the voices of the three defendants.

She discounted those of bespoke tailor John Kingdom and ex-Taxifast employee Phil Manning but referring to Mr Ruffles said: "It sounds slightly like your voice but I can't be sure."

Key Cabs, which trades as Taxifast, is suing the three men for conspiracy to injure and harassment. It alleges they conspired to make calls to Expotel which damaged a major business deal the two firms were working on.

The firm also claims the defendants told Plymouth private hire drivers Taxifast was in financial trouble and published a damaging newsletter containing other allegations.

The three defendants, who are representing themselves at the Chancery Division hearing in Bristol, don't deny they wrote the newsletter but deny circulating it. They deny the other allegations but are also claiming Taxifast's finances are not as healthy as the firm has claimed.

On day two of the four-day trial, the court heard from ex-Taxifast driver Matj Lehocky who said he had tape-recorded a conversation with Mr Ruffles, where a transcript revealed he told Mr Lehocky the firm had financial problems, because, being Czech and not speaking good English at the time, he could then listen to it again and 'understand what was happening'.

He said he only passed it to Taxifast because he had 'concerns'.

Operations manager David Trace told the hearing he has sold 17 black cabs to Taxifast, but it was revealed he was still owed £435,000.

He also revealed, under cross-examination, that Taxifast had sold 16 of these, valued at about £30,000 each.

But he stressed he was 'not upset' at being owed the cash and was pleased to be 'given and opportunity' with an 'exciting company'.

He explained the sales by saying some of the black cab drivers had decided not to transfer over, or left, because they didn't want to enter Taxifast's 'regimented' way of working, and because Plymouth City Council had allocated the firm 20 black cab licences for taxi buses.

Mr Manning accused Taxifast of misleading Expotel with details of its finances, staffing levels and staff experience to secure a lucrative taxi brokerage deal with its Taxibank arm in early 2007.

But Taxifast managing director Simon Hirst denied this and said the phone calls made to Expotel caused a delay in finalising the deal and for Taxibank to miss out on contracts with major Government departments and companies such as Virgin Trains. The defendants put it to him there was no evidence against them, but he stressed: "I believe in my heart that you did it."

Expotel's chief executive officer Ian Burnley confirmed the calls caused a delay in the deal, and his firm would otherwise have 'introduced clients earlier'.

But he said he did not think he had met either Mr Ruffles or Mr Manning on a visit to Taxifast in Plymouth. It is claimed the pair must have known about the Expotel deal before it was finalised. The trial continues.

------------------------

Taxi boss sues over 'conspiracy'

Tuesday, December 02, 2008, 06:45

ALLEGATIONS made about the private life of Plymouth taxi mogul John Preece, and the financial health of his companies, seriously damaged a major business deal, a court hearing has been told.

Bosses at a firm which was about to conclude a lucrative deal with Mr Preece's Taxibank operation were told he had an affair with an employee, staff accessed pornographic websites at work and how Mr Preece's firms were in financial dire straits, the civil hearing heard.

This caused the business deal to suffer a costly delay, it was claimed.

Mr Preece's Key Cabs firm is also claiming it was 'bombarded' with a stream of insulting emails, faxes and texts. One even offered the Taxifast chairman use of a chamber pot, claiming, in a metaphor for financial paucity, that he did not have one of his own to use.

Key Cabs, which trades as Taxifast and owns most of Taxibank, is now suing bespoke tailor John Kingdom and two former Taxifast employees, Phil Manning and Dean Ruffles, at the High Court in Bristol.

Mr Preece is claiming they were behind the conspiracy which resulted in delays to the deal with event management agency Expotel.

It is alleged the three worked together to spread allegations to Expotel bosses and Taxifast's own drivers, some of whom were shareholders in the firm, which said the company was in financial difficulty.

They did this, it is alleged, via telephone calls to Expotel, by discussions with private hire drivers, and via two newsletters attributed to a taxi firm, called Unicabs, set up by Messrs Kingdom, Manning and Ruffles.

The motive remains unclear, Taxifast's barrister David Fletcher told Judge Mark Havelock-Allan at the Chancery Division hearing.

However, he told the court Mr Ruffles, Taxifast's former operations manager, may have been motivated by an affair Mr Preece conducted with his wife Jane Ruffles.

Mr Fletcher told the court Taxifast was suing for conspiracy to injure, and harassment. But this hearing, scheduled for four days, would just deal with the issue of liability – whether the three defendants, who deny the allegations, conspired to injure and harassed Taxifast.

If they are found liable, another hearing would be called to decide damages.

The court was also told Mr Preece had dropped an additional claim against the defendants for damages to his business reputation.

Mr Fletcher told the court Expotel was on the verge of signing a money-spinning taxi brokerage deal with Mr Preece's Taxibank company in February 2007. This was expected to create 200 jobs in Plymouth.

Mr Fletcher claimed 'everybody knew about the Expotel contract in this company', including Mr Ruffles and Mr Manning, who were both employed by Taxifast at that time.

But as the deal was about to be finalised an unidentified man rang Expotel and said Taxibank was 'financially in debt', 'the chairman had run off with his wife' and 'employees looked at pornography online at the company', the court heard.

During the next two months there were two further calls, one from the same man, one from an anonymous woman.

Mr Fletcher said in March 2007, Mr Ruffles approached Taxifast driver Matj Lehocky and the barrister quoted from a transcript of their conversation, where Mr Ruffles talked about Unicabs and how 'John has got no money'.

Mr Fletcher said: "Unicabs was a front from start to finish, an excuse for a campaign of vilification that they undertook."

He said two newsletters, connected to Unicabs, a licensed firm which never traded, were distributed to taxi drivers and Expotel.

One was described as 'an embarrassing document attacking Mr Preece personally' and accusing him of 'gratuitous bullying' of his drivers.

The second was 'a generalised attack on Mr Preece' accusing him of 'philandering and gambling', and 'suggesting something improper to do with investment of drivers' money'.

Mr Fletcher spoke of emails sent to Taxifast, including one claiming Mr Kingdom had lent money to Mr Preece.

This, Mr Fletcher told the court, was 'a figment of Mr Kingdom's imagination', and said: "John Kingdom is living in a Walter Mitty world."

The defendants, representing themselves, later cross-examined Taxifast managing director Simon Hirst, claiming Taxifast's deal with Expotel, which eventually went ahead, had not been the financial success the firm predicted, but it was not as a result of anything the defendants had done.

They also claimed Mr Ruffles and Mr Manning had not been at Taxifast meetings where the Expotel deal was discussed in 2006, and therefore could not have known about it.

Mr Manning asked why minutes of daily staff meetings had not been produced, to reveal who was present.

Mr Hirst explained the meetings were short and the only notes taken were when actions needed to be carried out.

The trial, which is due to conclude on Thursday, continues today.

Brilliant Steve
They pulled that story which was at

http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news...-investigation...

Also see this BBC article on Preece
Plymouth City Council allows masons to control taxi's

Council accused of licensing too many Private Hire cars
http://www.bbc.co.uk/devon/news/0520...ire_cars.shtml
Friday, December 05, 2008, 07:05

HIGH-profile businessmen John Preece and John Kingdom have both been at the centre of serious investigations it emerged as the pair came face to face during a dramatic fourth day in the High Court.

Bespoke tailor Mr Kingdom was involved in an investigation about a theft allegation at a Masonic Lodge and Taxifast tycoon Mr Preece was probed about payments to an unnamed Plymouth City Councillor, the hearing, in Bristol, heard.

And, as Mr Kingdom corss-examined Mr Preece for a whole day in the civil hearing, it emerged both men suspected each other of initiating the investigations.

Mr Kingdom, boss of Stitches Tailoring, also accused Mr Preece of being ‘envious’ of his lifestyle, and said the end of their 20-year friendship had felt like ‘a divorce’.

Mr Preece denied there had been such a friendship and also a raft of accusations put by Mr Kingdom.

The Taxifast chairman repeatedly claimed the cross-examination to be a ‘fishing expedition’ and called Mr Kingdom a ‘poisonous Walter Mitty’.

Key Cabs, which trades as Taxifast, is suing Mr Kingdom, and ex-Taxifast employees Phil Manning and Dean Ruffles for conspiracy to injure and harassment. It alleges they conspired to make phone calls to event management firm Expotel which damaged a major business deal it was working on with Key Cabs’ Taxibank operation.

Taxifast also claims the defendants told Plymouth private hire drivers it was in financial trouble and published damaging newsletters containing allegations about the firm’s finance and Mr Preece’s private life.

The three defendants, who are representing themselves at the Chancery Division hearing in Bristol, admit they wrote the newsletters but deny circulating them. They deny the other allegations but are also claiming Taxifast’s finances are not as healthy as the firm had said.

On the third day, the trial had heard how there is an on-going probe by Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs into tax matters relating to Mr Preece.

But it also emerged the man ‘responsible’ for the investigation being called was Mr Kingdom.

As the trial took another dramatic twist, Mr Kingdom yesterday asked Mr Preece about whether he had spoken to Mr Ruffles about an investigation at the Mount Edgecumbe Masonic Hall where Mr Kingdom had been a bar manager, and an allegation of theft.

Mr Preece said: “I really don’t know.”

But then said: “You are out of your lodge, you are no longer a member of that lodge.”

Mr Kingdom asked: “Have you sent information to another lodge member?”

Mr Preece replied: “I am not a free mason, I have never wanted to be a free mason.”

Mr Kingdom asked if he had supplied information about court cases Mr Kingdom had been involved with, and Mr Preece said: “No.”

“Are you saying your company and you have never supplied any information?” asked Mr Kingdom.

“I can only talk about me and I have never supplied any information,” Mr Preece answered.

Mr Kingdom then produced a letter from the Masonic hall’s trustees which he said proved his ‘integrity’.

He asked Mr Preece if he had been behind a customs investigation into a rival Plymouth taxi firm, for ‘selling tobacco and red diesel’.

Mr Preece said he had not.

The taxi mogul was also questioned about an allegation that he had ‘bribed’ a Plymouth City Councillor and was quizzed by police.

“The allegation was that I had given the money to get contracts for myself,” said Mr Preece. “The police said there was no reason to be concerned, they wanted to clear up certain allegations.”

He explained his firm had carried out a transport survey, and admitted trying to get ‘a question about taxi buses in there’ but stressed: “That’s not bribing.”

He added: “They just wanted to know if I lent money to someone, as I do to a lot of people.”

Mr Kingdom asked if a company cheque had been paid to a woman, who then wrote a cheque to the unnamed city councillor.

“Did I make a contribution to the Liberal Democrats? Yes I did,” Mr Preece answered. “But I have also made contributions to the Conservative Party, as I still do, you know that.”

At this point Mr Kingdom admitted he had made a statement about this to police, saying they came to him because of his long friendship with Mr Preece.

He asked: “Was it a donation to that particular councillor for her party?”

Mr Preece said: “I can’t remember I think it was for the Liberal Democrat Party.”

During the heated questioning Mr Preece had said: “You tried to destroy people.”

He also accused Mr Kingdom of ‘plaguing’ him, and referred to a High Court hearing last year when Mr Kingdom was handed a suspended jail sentence for contempt after making allegations.

Mr Kingdom asked if he had ‘stopped’ when asked to, but Mr Preece said: “No, you did not stop harassing me, no.”

During yesterday’s hearing Mr Kingdom said: “We were friends for 20 years. I consider our friendship was broken like a divorced couple.”

Mr Preece replied: “There was never any friendship, you have been doing things behind my back.”

Mr Kingdom asked: “Have you ever been envious of me?”

Mr Preece replied: “I would never be envious of you John – I pity you.”

Mr Kingdom answered: “I have a fabulous wife, two children, I live in probably a much better house than you do, I have my own business premises – you have ended up, at 66, living in someone else’s house, with the business problems you have and no family whatsoever, why?”

Mr Preece said: “You have been pretty crass and stupid. I have said nothing about you.”

Later Mr Preece accused Mr Kingdom of being ‘a poisonous Walter Mitty’, while Mr Kingdom referred to language used in Taxifast newsletters, Mr Preece’s relations with the city council and his record on bringing litigation, and asked Mr Preece: “Do you consider yourself to be a bully?”

Mr Preece said: “No.”

The trial continues.

---------------------------

'FBI called in on property deals'
Friday, December 05, 2008, 19:31

ALLEGATIONS about taxi mogul John Preece's property dealings in America were made to the famous Federal Bureau of Investigation by bespoke Plymouth tailor John Kingdom, the High Court has heard.

As the civil action brought by Mr Preece and his Keycabs company went into a sensational fifth day in Bristol, Mr Kingdom admitted contacting the FBI.

But the allegation was described as 'nonsense' and an 'attempt to cause confusion' by Mr Preece's barrister David Fletcher.

The court also heard that Mr Kingdom had amassed 22 tape recordings of conversations with people described as 'disgruntled' with Mr Preece.

Yesterday the court was told about more allegations, this time about the world-famous FBI.

Mr Fletcher said that an email had been sent to the FBI in Las Vegas but said that the email address had been spelt incorrectly with an 'A' instead of an 'E' in Las Vegas.

Mr Fletcher said: "If it had been a real email it would have been spelt 'Vegas'."

But Mr Kingdom stressed: "I have spoken to the FBI. It is not a spoof. I may have faxed it to them."

Mr Fletcher asked: "You think you may have faxed it to the FBI in Las Vegas? Do they have FBI in Las Vegas?"

Mr Kingdom said: "No, the London office."

Mr Fletcher said: "It is a nonsense, another attempt to cause confusion."

He said the allegation referred to a mortgage Mr Preece had on a house in Nevada but asked how Mr Kingdom had information about such dealings and indeed whether what Mr Preece was alleged to have done was even illegal.

Keycabs, which trades as Taxifast, is suing Mr Kingdom and two ex-Taxifast employees, Phil Manning and Dean Ruffles, for conspiracy to injure and harasssment.

The firm claims they damaged a major business deal between Keycabs' Taxibank operation and event management firm Expotel.

It is alleged they did this via phone calls to Expotel and two newsletters containing allegations about Taxifast finances and the private life of Mr Preece.

The defendants admit writing the newsletters but deny circulating them, claiming they were designed as a private joke. They deny the other allegations.

There was also further discussion about allegations made about the Taxifast chairman, Mr Preece, to the police and the Inland Revenue, regarding his tax position.

The court heard more about allegations made by Mr Kingdom to the Inland Revenue about another prominent Plymouth businessman which resulted in, the court heard 'that man having to pay £400,000'.

Mr Fletcher told Mr Kingdom he was 'a serial reporter to the Inland Revenue', which Mr Kingdom denied.

Earlier the court had heard that allegations had been made to police and taxmen about Mr Preece and these were still being investigated.

Mr Kingdom was alleged in court to have been 'responsible' for those inquiries.

The court also heard that allegations of theft at a Masonic Lodge to which Mr Kingdom belongs had been made and Mr Kingdom has quizzed Mr Preece about whether he had passed information to that lodge.

Mr Fletcher also said that reporting Mr Preece to police and the Inland Revenue was an 'attempt to intimidate him'.

Mr Kingdom replied: "No, sir".

He said that he received information from 'disgruntled employees' and added 'there were a lot'.

Earlier Mr Fletcher had asked Mr Kingdom if he had written to Taxifast managing director Simon Hirst alleging 'Mr Preece was mentally unstable'.

Mr Kingdom replied: "Yes".

Mr Kingdom also said his memory was cloudy on some matters because 'I have been on Valium for 18 months'.

However, when he was grilled about the two newsletters he denies sending and various emails he admitting sending to Mr Preece he repeatedly stressed they had been intended as 'spoofs'.

He said one newsletter had been written by Mr Manning and the other by him, though he alleged that a copy which fell into the hands of Taxifast had been altered.

He said of the newsletter he authored: "It is a wind-up".

Mr Kingdom said his only involvement with a rival taxi firm called Unicabs was as a potential landlord.

The civil trial in The Chancellory Division and before his Hon Judge Mark Havelock-Allan was scheduled to end on Thursday but will now go into next week.

------------------

Taxi mogul in tax probe court told

Thursday, December 04, 2008, 07:00

TAXI mogul John Preece is at the centre of a tax investigation, a High Court hearing has been told.

The Taxifast chairman revealed, during cross-examination on the third day of a civil trial his firm is bringing, there is an ongoing probe by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.

But it also emerged the man 'responsible' for the investigation being called was bespoke tailor John Kingdom, one of three defendants and the person cross-examining Mr Preece.

Mr Kingdom had asked several questions about Mr Preece's whereabouts at different times, and property he owned in Plymouth and abroad, stating for tax purposes the businessman had to spend a certain amount of time out of the country.

Mr Kingdom mentioned 'a personal investigation opened by HMRC' and asked: "Is that still ongoing?"

Mr Preece replied: "Yes."

He said it was about 'alleged discrepancies' regarding time spent abroad.

His Honour Judge Mark Havelock-Allan asked Mr Kingdom: "You are responsible for the HMRC investigation?"

Mr Kingdom replied he was 'visited from an officer'.

Mr Preece then accused Mr Kingdom of initiating another tax probe into a well-known Plymouth businessman.

He said to the tailor: "You cannot resist interfering in my life and other people's lives. You have destroyed people's lives."

Key Cabs, which trades as Taxifast, is suing Mr Kingdom, and ex-Taxifast employees Phil Manning and Dean Ruffles for conspiracy to injure and harassment.

It alleges they conspired to make phone calls to event management firm Expotel which damaged a major business deal it was working on with Key Cabs' Taxibank operation.

Taxifast also claims the defendants told Plymouth private hire drivers it was in financial trouble and published a damaging newsletter containing other allegations.

The three defendants, who are representing themselves at the Chancery Division hearing in Bristol, don't deny they wrote the newsletter but deny circulating it. They deny the other allegations but are also claiming Taxifast's finances are not as healthy as the firm had said.

In a dramatic afternoon session, Mr Preece said allegations in one of the newsletters had been 'hurtful' and accused it of being produced as part of a 'conspiracy'.

Mr Kingdom asked if Mr Preece was a business 'hardball'.

"You have to be tough," Mr Preece said.

The court was then told about a threat to kill Mr Preece and what Mr Kingdom described as a 'catalogue of disasters'.

"You are a disaster – it's not a catalogue of disasters," Mr Preece replied.

Mr Kingdom then listed a number of attacks against Mr Preece's property including his stables being burned down, his dog being killed, paving slabs being thrown through a window, and paint thrown on a wall.

"Who needs enemies when I have you?" Mr Preece asked Mr Kingdom. "I've been burgled five times. You forgot to mention that."

Mr Kingdom asked if Mr Preece thought Hackney carriage drivers were responsible for the attacks and the private hire boss said: "Yes."

But he denied the accusation that his Plymouth home was a 'fortress'.

Mr Kingdom also asked about Mr Preece's relationship with Mr Ruffles, his former operations manager, and his wife Jane, with whom Mr Preece has told the court he 'co-habited' for a time.

Mr Preece described Mr Ruffles as having been 'a good driver' and Mrs Ruffles as 'special'.

Mr Kingdom asked Mr Preece about other women he had been involved with.

Mr Preece accused Mr Kingdom of being a 'gossip', denying loans he sought were to 'prop up Taxibank' but for normal business development.

He explained he had sold black cabs bought for £500,000 from David Trace, now a Taxifast director, because they were superfluous once Plymouth City Council had decided to grant him 20 taxibus licences for which he would need new vehicles.

Earlier the court heard from Taxifast security consultant Michael Foden, who said he saw one of the newsletters at a Hackney rank but had not collected it.

Driver Christopher Trevethan said he has spoken about the newsletters to Hackney drivers who were 'disgusted' at the personal content relating to Mr Preece, but were 'generally delighted' at the accusations about Taxifast's finances.

He said the firm's 'loyal customers' would have been concerned to think the company was in trouble.

Taxifast employee Gary Chase said the newsletters caused concerns among staff.

The trial continues.

--------------------

Tears from ex-taxi boss

Wednesday, December 03, 2008, 07:00

ONE of the defendants being sued by leading Plymouth private hire firm Taxifast left the courtroom in tears during the second day of a High Court hearing.

Ex-Taxifast operations manager Dean Ruffles broke down during cross-examination of his successor at the company, David Trace.

Mr Trace had told the civil hearing how he had visited Mr Ruffles' home to change locks following the revelation of an affair between Mr Ruffles' wife Jane and Taxifast chairman John Preece.

Earlier Sharon Smith, marketing communications manager for event management firm Expotel, told the court that Mr Ruffles' voice sounded 'a little bit like' that of an unknown telephone caller who made allegations about Taxifast staff and finances and said the firm's chairman had 'run off' with his wife.

London-based Ms Smith was only able to say the caller had a 'regional accent', and was then asked by Judge Mark Havelock-Allen to listen to the voices of the three defendants.

She discounted those of bespoke tailor John Kingdom and ex-Taxifast employee Phil Manning but referring to Mr Ruffles said: "It sounds slightly like your voice but I can't be sure."

Key Cabs, which trades as Taxifast, is suing the three men for conspiracy to injure and harassment. It alleges they conspired to make calls to Expotel which damaged a major business deal the two firms were working on.

The firm also claims the defendants told Plymouth private hire drivers Taxifast was in financial trouble and published a damaging newsletter containing other allegations.

The three defendants, who are representing themselves at the Chancery Division hearing in Bristol, don't deny they wrote the newsletter but deny circulating it. They deny the other allegations but are also claiming Taxifast's finances are not as healthy as the firm has claimed.

On day two of the four-day trial, the court heard from ex-Taxifast driver Matj Lehocky who said he had tape-recorded a conversation with Mr Ruffles, where a transcript revealed he told Mr Lehocky the firm had financial problems, because, being Czech and not speaking good English at the time, he could then listen to it again and 'understand what was happening'.

He said he only passed it to Taxifast because he had 'concerns'.

Operations manager David Trace told the hearing he has sold 17 black cabs to Taxifast, but it was revealed he was still owed £435,000.

He also revealed, under cross-examination, that Taxifast had sold 16 of these, valued at about £30,000 each.

But he stressed he was 'not upset' at being owed the cash and was pleased to be 'given and opportunity' with an 'exciting company'.

He explained the sales by saying some of the black cab drivers had decided not to transfer over, or left, because they didn't want to enter Taxifast's 'regimented' way of working, and because Plymouth City Council had allocated the firm 20 black cab licences for taxi buses.

Mr Manning accused Taxifast of misleading Expotel with details of its finances, staffing levels and staff experience to secure a lucrative taxi brokerage deal with its Taxibank arm in early 2007.

But Taxifast managing director Simon Hirst denied this and said the phone calls made to Expotel caused a delay in finalising the deal and for Taxibank to miss out on contracts with major Government departments and companies such as Virgin Trains. The defendants put it to him there was no evidence against them, but he stressed: "I believe in my heart that you did it."

Expotel's chief executive officer Ian Burnley confirmed the calls caused a delay in the deal, and his firm would otherwise have 'introduced clients earlier'.

But he said he did not think he had met either Mr Ruffles or Mr Manning on a visit to Taxifast in Plymouth. It is claimed the pair must have known about the Expotel deal before it was finalised. The trial continues.

------------------------

Taxi boss sues over 'conspiracy'

Tuesday, December 02, 2008, 06:45

ALLEGATIONS made about the private life of Plymouth taxi mogul John Preece, and the financial health of his companies, seriously damaged a major business deal, a court hearing has been told.

Bosses at a firm which was about to conclude a lucrative deal with Mr Preece's Taxibank operation were told he had an affair with an employee, staff accessed pornographic websites at work and how Mr Preece's firms were in financial dire straits, the civil hearing heard.

This caused the business deal to suffer a costly delay, it was claimed.

Mr Preece's Key Cabs firm is also claiming it was 'bombarded' with a stream of insulting emails, faxes and texts. One even offered the Taxifast chairman use of a chamber pot, claiming, in a metaphor for financial paucity, that he did not have one of his own to use.

Key Cabs, which trades as Taxifast and owns most of Taxibank, is now suing bespoke tailor John Kingdom and two former Taxifast employees, Phil Manning and Dean Ruffles, at the High Court in Bristol.

Mr Preece is claiming they were behind the conspiracy which resulted in delays to the deal with event management agency Expotel.

It is alleged the three worked together to spread allegations to Expotel bosses and Taxifast's own drivers, some of whom were shareholders in the firm, which said the company was in financial difficulty.

They did this, it is alleged, via telephone calls to Expotel, by discussions with private hire drivers, and via two newsletters attributed to a taxi firm, called Unicabs, set up by Messrs Kingdom, Manning and Ruffles.

The motive remains unclear, Taxifast's barrister David Fletcher told Judge Mark Havelock-Allan at the Chancery Division hearing.

However, he told the court Mr Ruffles, Taxifast's former operations manager, may have been motivated by an affair Mr Preece conducted with his wife Jane Ruffles.

Mr Fletcher told the court Taxifast was suing for conspiracy to injure, and harassment. But this hearing, scheduled for four days, would just deal with the issue of liability – whether the three defendants, who deny the allegations, conspired to injure and harassed Taxifast.

If they are found liable, another hearing would be called to decide damages.

The court was also told Mr Preece had dropped an additional claim against the defendants for damages to his business reputation.

Mr Fletcher told the court Expotel was on the verge of signing a money-spinning taxi brokerage deal with Mr Preece's Taxibank company in February 2007. This was expected to create 200 jobs in Plymouth.

Mr Fletcher claimed 'everybody knew about the Expotel contract in this company', including Mr Ruffles and Mr Manning, who were both employed by Taxifast at that time.

But as the deal was about to be finalised an unidentified man rang Expotel and said Taxibank was 'financially in debt', 'the chairman had run off with his wife' and 'employees looked at pornography online at the company', the court heard.

During the next two months there were two further calls, one from the same man, one from an anonymous woman.

Mr Fletcher said in March 2007, Mr Ruffles approached Taxifast driver Matj Lehocky and the barrister quoted from a transcript of their conversation, where Mr Ruffles talked about Unicabs and how 'John has got no money'.

Mr Fletcher said: "Unicabs was a front from start to finish, an excuse for a campaign of vilification that they undertook."

He said two newsletters, connected to Unicabs, a licensed firm which never traded, were distributed to taxi drivers and Expotel.

One was described as 'an embarrassing document attacking Mr Preece personally' and accusing him of 'gratuitous bullying' of his drivers.

The second was 'a generalised attack on Mr Preece' accusing him of 'philandering and gambling', and 'suggesting something improper to do with investment of drivers' money'.

Mr Fletcher spoke of emails sent to Taxifast, including one claiming Mr Kingdom had lent money to Mr Preece.

This, Mr Fletcher told the court, was 'a figment of Mr Kingdom's imagination', and said: "John Kingdom is living in a Walter Mitty world."

The defendants, representing themselves, later cross-examined Taxifast managing director Simon Hirst, claiming Taxifast's deal with Expotel, which eventually went ahead, had not been the financial success the firm predicted, but it was not as a result of anything the defendants had done.

They also claimed Mr Ruffles and Mr Manning had not been at Taxifast meetings where the Expotel deal was discussed in 2006, and therefore could not have known about it.

Mr Manning asked why minutes of daily staff meetings had not been produced, to reveal who was present.

Mr Hirst explained the meetings were short and the only notes taken were when actions needed to be carried out.

The trial, which is due to conclude on Thursday, continues today.

Brilliant Steve
They pulled that story which was at

http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news...-investigation...

Also see this BBC article on Preece
Plymouth City Council allows masons to control taxi's

Council accused of licensing too many Private Hire cars
http://www.bbc.co.uk/devon/news/0520...ire_cars.shtml

Queen and Duke land

Queen and Duke land at Middlemoor

Her Majesty the Queen and His Royal Highness Prince Philip The Duke of Edinburgh have this morning, Wednesday, May 2, 2012 landed at Police Headquarters, Middlemoor, Exeter.

At around 11.45am, Her Majesty touched down before meeting Chief Constable Shaun Sawyer and other dignitaries at Middlmeoor.

Around 200 people gathered at Middlemoor to welcome the royal party as part of the Diamond Jubilee tour.

Her Majesty made a brief stop before travelling on to Princesshay in Exeter City Centre.

Pentewan beach

Decapitated pony found on Pentewan beach

A decapitated pony has been found on a beach in Cornwall, police said.

The animal was found on Pentewan beach on Monday, after Brixham Coastguard was alerted.

Devon and Cornwall Police said its head was "severed cleanly" and it had leg injuries that may have been caused by it trying to get out of the water.

The force said the horse may have been dumped from a boat and injured by a propeller. Its death is not thought to be suspicious.

Devon and Cornwall Police said a wooden cross and dead seagull had been placed on top of the pony and RIP had been written in the sand, but it is believed this was done by someone not connected to the death.

The force said it was investigating the incident.

Derriford Hospital

Derriford Hospital car park man 'dead for two days'

The man, who had parked in a disabled bay, had recently attended an appointment at the hospital

A man who was found dead in his car at a Devon hospital is believed to have died two days earlier, police said.

The body of the man, 79, was found in his car by ambulance staff near the outpatient department of Derriford Hospital in Plymouth on Saturday.

It is believed he died on the Thursday in his parked vehicle. His death is not thought to be suspicious.

The trust said it was a "very sad" case but the man could not be seen by passers-by.

According to Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, the man, who had recently attended an appointment at the hospital, was not visible to anyone walking past.

The car was in a disabled parking area and displaying a valid disabled badge, so it did not need to show a ticket as disabled users had unlimited parking time at the site.

It is not known when the man returned to his car.

'Very sad'

A trust spokesperson said: "The parking areas are regularly patrolled. It is not unusual for cars to remain in our car parks for a longer period of time, in an unplanned way.

"For example, a patient may attend an outpatient appointment and then be admitted as an inpatient or they may be given medication, which means they are not allowed to drive home and have to leave their vehicle in a car park."

When the man was discovered, the trust's emergency response team attended and subsequently paramedics and the police were called.

All CCTV footage has now been passed to the police.

Devon and Cornwall Police said a post-mortem examination was to be carried out to determine the cause of death, and that the man's family had been informed.

The hospital trust said that it was a "very sad matter" and expressed its sympathies to the man's family.

Car park operators Vinci Park said: "Our sympathies are with this gentleman's family, and we are doing everything we can to assist with the ongoing investigation."

In Devon, England , Warhorse

In Devon, England,

 Albert Narracott admires a young thoroughbred foal. Much to his mother Rose's dismay, Albert's father, Ted, buys the colt at auction, though he was intending to buy a plough horse for his farm. The purchase is also to spite his landlord, Lyons, who tried to outbid him for the colt. Albert names the horse Joey and devotes much time to training him. Albert's best friend, Andrew Easton, watches as Albert teaches his colt many things, such as to come when he whistles.
Ted, who has a bad leg and is an alcoholic, has fallen behind on the rent. He promises to pay Lyons after the family sells its turnip crop. Rose shows Albert his father's medals from the Second Boer War in South Africa, where Ted served with the Imperial Yeomanry. Ted was severely wounded in action, and received the Distinguished Conduct Medal for bravery under fire. She gives Albert his father's regimental pennant, telling Albert that his father was not proud about what he did during the war, and that he had thrown the flag and medals away, though Rose saved and kept them hidden. Albert trains Joey for the plough and, to his neighbours' astonishment, prepares a stony hillside field to plant with turnips. But a rainstorm destroys the turnip field and, to pay the overdue rent (and without telling Albert), Ted sells Joey to Captain Nicholls as World War I breaks out. When Albert finds out, Nicholls promises him he will take care of Joey and hopefully return him after the war. Albert tries to enlist in the army, but is too young. Before the captain leaves with Joey, Albert ties his father's pennant to Joey's bridle.
Joey is trained for military operations and deployed to France with Captain Nicholls. In France, Captain Nicholls is killed in a cavalry charge, and the Germans capture the horses. Joey becomes attached to Topthorn, a larger black horse he had military training with. The two horses are used to pull an ambulance wagon driven by two German soldiers, Gunther, and his 14-year-old brother, Michael. Gunther gives the pennant to Michael when he is assigned to the German front, but then steals the horses so he and his brother can ride them back to Germany. One night, German soldiers discover the absent without leave brothers hiding in a windmill and execute them by firing squad for desertion.
A young French girl named Emilie finds the two horses inside the windmill. Emilie, who suffers from an unspecified illness, lives with her grandfather, who owns the property. Later, German soldiers arrive and confiscate all food and supplies from the property. Emilie's grandfather allows her to ride Joey on her birthday, but when the German soldiers return, they take the horses, though the grandfather keeps the pennant.
The story shifts to Albert, who has now enlisted and is fighting alongside Andrew in the Second Battle of the Somme in 1918, under the command of Lyons's son, David. After a British charge into no-man's land, Albert, Andrew, and other British soldiers miraculously make it across into a deserted German trench, where gas bombs explode, filling the trench with white fumes.
Joey and Topthorn are now being used to pull German heavy artillery, causing Topthorn to die from exhaustion. Joey escapes and runs into no-man's land where he gets entangled in barbed wire. Both British and German soldiers spot Joey and try to coax him to their respective sides. A British Geordie soldier named Colin, waving a white flag, arrives at Joey's side. A German soldier named Peter from Düsseldorf also comes over with wire cutters, and together they free Joey from the barbed wire. They flip a coin to decide where Joey goes; Colin wins and takes Joey back to the British camp.
Andrew died in the gas attack, but Albert survived, though he is temporarily blinded, with bandages covering his eyes. He is recuperating at a British medical camp when the Geordie soldier brings Joey into the medical camp looking for a veterinary surgeon. Meanwhile, Albert is told about the miracle horse back from no-man's land. The army doctor instructs Sgt. Fry to put Joey down due to his injuries, but when Fry is about to shoot, a soft whistle catches Joey's attention. Albert is led through the crowd to Joey, again whistling, while Joey comes over to Albert.
Albert says that he raised Joey, and gives the exact description of his horse markings, confirming his claim. The war ends and Albert's eyesight is restored, but only officers' horses will be shipped home. Joey and the others are to be auctioned off to the highest bidder. The soldiers gather funds to buy Joey for Albert, but during a bidding war with a French butcher reaching 30 pounds, an older gentleman suddenly arrives and bids 100 pounds, winning Joey. The man is Emilie's grandfather. It is implied that Emilie has died, and after hearing about the miracle horse, her grandfather walked three days to get Joey back for the sake of Emilie's memory.
Albert pleads with Emilie's grandfather for the horse to no avail, but before leaving, the grandfather pulls out the pennant and asks if it means anything to Albert. On being told it belonged to Albert's father, the grandfather has a change of heart, and gives Albert the flag and Joey, saying it is what Emilie would have wanted. In the end, Albert rides Joey back to his family's farm and returns the pennant to his father

this may start a new debate on the "call someone a racist tactic" needs it , breeding seperatism .

BRITAIN'S first black female MP

engulfed in a racism storm today after she claimed white people love playing "divide and rule".

Outspoken Labour frontbencher Diane Abbott's remark sparked calls for her to resign after she posted the comment on Twitter yesterday.

In a humiliating move, she was then shunned by her own party which made her out to be a HYPOCRITE given her work promoting anti-racism in the past.

And as she was quizzed over the tweet on Sky News she was embarrassingly interrupted by a phone call reportedly from Labour leader Ed Miliband who is said to have given her a dressing down and demanded she apologise.

The Labour Party said she was "wrong" to make such "sweeping generalisations".

A spokesman said: "We disagree with Diane's tweet. It is wrong to make sweeping generalisations about any race, creed, or culture.

"The Labour Party has always campaigned against such behaviour - and so has Diane Abbott."

Twitter followers also rounded on her.

N_Westie79 told her: "Surprised at racism shown by you. Always thought you had earthly quality, now I think you're a disgrace."

She desperately tried to defuse the row today by claiming her words had been taken out of context